When
I first started reading this book, I admit that I just wanted to read it
quickly and get it over with, but it was a very good story and pretty easy to
read and understand. I thought about some of my own experiences in the
residency thus far and I realized that during my observations, I focused a lot
on the academic side of the classroom and not so much the social aspect of it. I
had to really think back to what I have seen so far. It is interesting because in
my first placement, the 3rd grade classroom that I was in only had
10 students. In my time there, I did not see any of the exclusion that is
normally found in classrooms. Maybe the size of the class had something to do
with it. All of the students played together, although sometimes the 2 boys in
the class tended to group with each other more. But as a whole, there was really no exclusion. My Pre-K placement was a whole other story. It was actually pretty common to hear one of the kids saying, "Well, he/she said that she wasn't my friend!" or "He/she said I couldn't play over here!" In one case, I actually saw one of the kids leave a station because the teacher said that everybody could play in the area and then he did not want to play at all. She told him that that was not right and that we were all friends and could all play together, but at the age of 3, I wonder if he really understood exactly what she was saying.
I
am definitely all for everybody getting along and playing together, especially
after my own experiences as a child. When I moved in 6th grade and
attended another school, I did tend to be excluded at first since I was the “new girl” and I completely hated it. I always
used to get scolded and the “Golden
Rule” was a
big thing in our house: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
Once I began to be excluded, I realized how other students may have felt when I
was younger and I hated it. But as much as I agree with Paley on the concept,
part of me does not think that that is feasible and it is very idealistic. In
theory, it works, but when it comes to putting that into practice, I am still
on the fence about that one. To me, it seems a little counterproductive to tell
kids that they have to get along with and play with everybody because the real
world does not operate in that way, just like that 4th grade boy
told Paley during the discussion. I don't know. I am all for inclusion and treating everybody equally, but I am still not sure about how I feel about forcing kids to play together, especially as they get older.
I LOVED the way that Paley discussed the plan
with not only her students, but with students and teachers from other grades as
well. That is the number one thing that I am going to take from this book and
incorporate into my own classroom. It was very democratic and the students had
their own voice. Even if she did not agree with all of their ideas,
particularly Lisa, she still let them voice what they were thinking. Not only
that, after each discussion with students from other grades, she brought the ideas back to her classroom and asked her students what they thought about what was said. Even in kindergarten, she valued their opinions and voices. She also taught them about rejection. They were able to put actions and events with a word/concept that they might not have known until later grades. I am pretty sure that that is a year they will not forget.
Chamara, I had a similar initial experience with the book as you described. I had it for a while before reading it, and after I read a few pages I realized what a gem of a story it was!
ReplyDeleteI also loved the way that Paley discussed the concept of YCSYCP with kids from the other grades as well. It showed her students that she was seriously investigating the concept of having the rule in place. It was interesting to hear the feedback that she was given from the students at the upper grades and how her kindergarten students responded to the feedback.
An important statement that came from her exploration was that to initiate such a rule, it should happen at the youngest grade level when kids are more responsive to rules.